Symmetry within Solutions

We define the concept of an internal symmetry. This is a symmety within a solution of a constraint satisfaction problem. We compare this to solution symmetry, which is a mapping between different solutions of the same problem. We argue that we may be able to exploit both types of symmetry when finding solutions. We illustrate the potential of exploiting internal symmetries on two benchmark domains: Van der Waerden numbers and graceful graphs. By identifying internal symmetries we are able to extend the state of the art in both cases.Comment: AAAI 2010, Proceedings of Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligenc

Constructing Minimal Perfect Hash Functions Using SAT Technology

Minimal perfect hash functions (MPHFs) are used to provide efficient access to values of large dictionaries (sets of key-value pairs). Discovering new algorithms for building MPHFs is an area of active research, especially from the perspective of storage efficiency. The information-theoretic limit for MPHFs is 1/(ln 2) or roughly 1.44 bits per key. The current best practical algorithms range between 2 and 4 bits per key. In this article, we propose two SAT-based constructions of MPHFs. Our first construction yields MPHFs near the information-theoretic limit. For this construction, current state-of-the-art SAT solvers can handle instances where the dictionaries contain up to 40 elements, thereby outperforming the existing (brute-force) methods. Our second construction uses XOR-SAT filters to realize a practical approach with long-term storage of approximately 1.83 bits per key.Comment: Accepted for AAAI 202

SAT Competition 2018

Peer reviewe

Exponential separations using guarded extension variables

We study the complexity of proof systems augmenting resolution with inference rules that allow, given a formula $\Gamma$ in conjunctive normal form, deriving clauses that are not necessarily logically implied by $\Gamma$ but whose addition to $\Gamma$ preserves satisfiability. When the derived clauses are allowed to introduce variables not occurring in $\Gamma$, the systems we consider become equivalent to extended resolution. We are concerned with the versions of these systems without new variables. They are called BC${}^-$, RAT${}^-$, SBC${}^-$, and GER${}^-$, denoting respectively blocked clauses, resolution asymmetric tautologies, set-blocked clauses, and generalized extended resolution. Each of these systems formalizes some restricted version of the ability to make assumptions that hold "without loss of generality," which is commonly used informally to simplify or shorten proofs. Except for SBC${}^-$, these systems are known to be exponentially weaker than extended resolution. They are, however, all equivalent to it under a relaxed notion of simulation that allows the translation of the formula along with the proof when moving between proof systems. By taking advantage of this fact, we construct formulas that separate RAT${}^-$ from GER${}^-$ and vice versa. With the same strategy, we also separate SBC${}^-$ from RAT${}^-$. Additionally, we give polynomial-size SBC${}^-$ proofs of the pigeonhole principle, which separates SBC${}^-$ from GER${}^-$ by a previously known lower bound. These results also separate the three systems from BC${}^-$ since they all simulate it. We thus give an almost complete picture of their relative strengths